Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

DCMS online

. org

Northeast Florida Medicine

Vol. 66, No. 4 2015

19

Guest Editorial

The field of inflammatory bowel disease is mostly uncharted

territory. Like many questions in life, the two points of greatest

interest are usually the least understood. I am referring to the

beginning and the end. We are just starting to figure out how

IBD begins. We are also trying to figure out a cure. It is in

this setting that the study of

inflammatory bowel disease

is so humbling. It is hard to

be an expert in a field where

you cannot tell a patient how

they got the illness and how

they can get rid of it.However,

we are making huge advances.

The field is exploding with

new medications. Gone are

the days when all we had were

steroidsandmesalamine.Now,

physicians are able to offer

something else to patients. It

is called hope.

Cognizant that most of our readers are either approaching

middle age or deep in the throes of it, the question begs itself,

“How did I get here?” This is the question regarding science itself.

If the medications we had were perfect, then no new medications

would be needed. However, that has not been the case with in-

flammatory bowel disease. Meta-analysis studies have shown that

mesalamine-based products are all pretty much equivalent.

1

The

absolute reduction of risk for 5ASA products is approximately

25 percent better than placebo. However, this is only in mild to

moderatedisease.Inmoreadvanceddisease,the5ASAproductsare

almostfutile.Thereinliestheparadox.Themajorityofpatientswith

inflammatory bowel disease do not present withmild tomoderate

disease. They present mostly with moderate to severe disease.

2

As

such, a giant cohort of patients are offered medications that are

doomed to fail. There was a study a long time ago that stated that

perhaps 5ASA products might have a chemotherapeutic effect.

However, amore recent study states this may not be the case either.

And yet even more studies suggest that they might!

3,4,5

As such, it

is unclear what the role of 5ASA products are in the majority of

IBDpatients.Moreover, another study revealed that once a patient

with inflammatory bowel disease has received steroid therapy, the

efficacy of 5ASA products becomes nil.

6

Next came immunotherapy. Medications including azathio-

prine andmethotrexate serve to staunch theunrelenting cascade of

the immune system by inhibiting lymphocyte activity. However,

the risks of immunotherapy are numerous. They include, but

are not necessarily limited to, the following: nausea, vomiting,

fever, hair loss, pancreatitis, hepatitis, drop in white blood cell

count and lymphoma. Moreover, these medications only work

perhaps 35 percent of the time.

7

Then came a beacon of hope. A new day dawned as biologic

therapies began to take hold. Starting with infliximab and now

refined with vedolizumab, physicians are starting to notice that

there is an incredible overlap between seemingly unrelated ill-

nesses. People with psoriasis had severe joint pains. People with

Crohn’s disease had extraintestinal manifestations such as, at

times, psoriasis. IBD patients had joint pains and many of them

hadpositive rheumatoid factors andpositive antinuclear antibody

assays. In essence, the field of inflammatory bowel disease is just

a subsection of the field of immunology. We noticed that an

earlier application of more advanced therapy in patients with

rheumatoid arthritis could change their future. These patients

were treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatologic drugs

(DMARD). It turns out that the earlier you apply biologic drugs

the less likely the patient will develop deleterious and irrevoca-

ble consequences. Actually, this is not a surprise. The Architect

of the human body is a genius. The axiom “time is tissue” is

universally applicable. The longer you have reflux disease that is

untreated the more likely you will develop Barrett’s esophagus

and potentially esophageal cancer. The longer you have low

blood flow to your brain as a stroke evolves the more likely you

are to develop irreparable neurologic consequences. The longer

you have low blood flow to your heart, the more likely you will

have permanent consequences to the myocardium. And so it is

with inflammatory bowel disease. The longer you have unabated

inflammatory changes of the GI tract the more likely you will

have immutable consequences in the form of perhaps a fistula

or an abscess or a stricture and the more likely you will have

intractable disease that will not be amenable to medical therapy.

The purpose of this issue of Northeast Florida Medicine is to

give a cursory overview of numerous subtopics of inflammatory

bowel disease. However, if the only thing you take out of this

edition is the fact that time is tissue and that tissue is the issue,

then we have done our job. Enjoy.

v

Mark Fleisher, MD

Guest Editor

Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

By Mark Fleisher, MD

References

1. Feagan BG, Chande N, MacDonald JK. Are there

any differences in the efficacy and safety of different

formulations of Oral 5-ASA used for induction

and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis?

evidence from cochrane reviews.

Inflamm Bowel

Dis.

2013 Aug;19(9):2031-40.

2. Sninsky CA, Cort DH, Shanahan F, Powers BJ, Ses-

sions JT, Pruitt RE, Jacobs WH, Lo SK, Targan SR,

Cerda JJ, et al. Oral mesalamine (Asacol) for mildly

to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A multicenter

study.

Ann Intern Med.

1991 Sep 1;115(5):350-5.

3. Giannini EG, Kane SV, Testa R, Savarino V. 5-ASA

and colorectal cancer chemoprevention in inflam-

matory bowel disease: can we afford to wait for ‘best

evidence’?

Dig Liver Dis.

2005 Oct;37(10):723-31.

4. Ritland SR, Leighton JA, Hirsch RE, Morrow JD,

Weaver AL, Gendler SJ. Evaluation of 5-aminosa-

licylic acid (5-ASA) for cancer chemoprevention:

lack of efficacy against nascent adenomatous polyps

in the Apc(Min) mouse.

Clin Cancer Res.

1999

Apr;5(4):855-63.

5. O’Connor A, Packey CD, Akbari M, Moss AC. Me-

salamine, but Not Sulfasalazine, Reduces the Risk of

Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with Inflammatory

Bowel Disease: An Agent-specific Systematic Review

and Meta-analysis.

Inflamm Bowel Dis.

2015 Aug

20. [Epub ahead of print]

6. Camma C, Giunta M, Roselli M, Cottone M. Me-

salamine in the Maintenance Treatment of Crohn’s

Disease: A Meta-analysis Adjusted for Confounding

Variables.

Gastroenterol.

1997;113; 1465-73.

7. Warman JI, Korelitz BI, Fleisher MR, Janardhanam

R. Cumulative experience with short- and long-term

toxicity to 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of Crohn’s

disease and ulcerative colitis.

J Clin Gastroenterol.

2003

Sep;37(3):220-5.