Northeast Florida Medicine Journal, Summer 2015 - page 50

50
Vol. 66, No. 2 2015
Northeast Florida Medicine
Pediatric Oncology
Conclusion
Recognition that AYA oncology is a necessary division
of study has occurred over the last nine years.
1
The dif-
ferent requirements of this age group and developmental
stage are outlined above. In Northeast Florida, we have
moved quickly to address this need for our population
and C.H.A.T. is the result. We believe this will increase
survival, improve adherence and compliance, and lead to
more positive psychological and social outcomes in the long
run. While Cancer is Healed, the Adolescents are Talking
and, as seen, this is a great benefit to the region.
v
References
1. Bleyer A. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology:
The First A.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol
2007;24:325-336.
2. Fernandez CV, Barr RD. Adolescents and young adults
with cancer: An orphaned population.
Paediatr Child
Health
2006;11:103-106.
3. Ramanujachar R, Richards S, Hann I, Webb D. Ado-
lescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: emerging
from the shadow of paediatric and adult treatment
protocols.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2006;47:748-756.
4. Cost NG, Lubahn JD, Adibi M, et al. A comparison
of pediatric, adolescent, and adult testicular germ cell
malignancy.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2014;61:446-451.
5. Freyer DR, Felgenhauer J, Perentesis J. Children’s On-
cology Group’s 2013 Blueprint for Research: Adoles-
cent and Young Adult Oncology.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2013;60:1055-1058.
6. Zebrack B, Mathews-Bradshaw B, Siegel S. Quality
Cancer Care for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Posi-
tion Statement.
J Clin Onc
2010;28:4862-4867.
7. Stock W, La M, Sanford B, et al. What determines the
outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute
lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group
protocols? A comparison of Children’s Cancer Group
and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies.
Blood
2008;112,1646-1654.
8. Pole JD, Alibhai SMH, Ethier MC, et al. Adolescents
with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated at pediatric
versus adult hospitals.
Annals Oncol
2013;24:801-806.
9. Woods WG, Franklin ARK, Alonzo TA, et al. Outcome
of adolescents and young adults with acute myeloid
leukemia treated on COG trials compared to CALGB
and SWOG trials.
Cancer
2013;119:4170-4179.
10. Zebrack B, Chesler MA, Kaplan S. To foster healing among
adolescents and young adults with cancer: What helps?
What hurts?
Support Care Cancer
2010;18:131-135.
11. Treadgold CL , Kuperberg A. Been there, done that,
wrote the blog: The choices and challenges of support-
ing adolescents and young adults with cancer.
J Clin
Onc
2010;28:4842-4849.
12. Stuber M, Gonzalez S, Benjamin H, et al. Fighting for
recovery.
J Psychother Pract Res
1995;4:286-296.
13. Zebrack B, Bleyer A, Albritton K, et al. Assessing the
health care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer
patients and survivors.
Cancer
2006;107:2915-2923.
14. Schiffman JD, Csongradi E, Suzuki LK. Internet use
among adolescent and young adults (AYA) with cancer.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2008;51:410-415.
15. Dyson GJ, Thompson K, Palmer S, et al. The relationship
between unmet needs and distress amongst young people
with cancer.
Support Care Cancer
2012;20:75-85.
16. Gurney JG, Krull KR, Kadan-Lottick N, et al. Social
outcomes in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
Cohort.
J Clin Onc
2009;27:2390-2395.
17. Diller L, Chow EJ, Gurney JG, et al. Chronic disease in
the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort: A Review
of Published Findings.
J Clin Onc
2009;27:2339-2355.
1...,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49 51,52
Powered by FlippingBook